In The Politics of Autism, I analyze the myth that vaccines cause autism. This bogus idea can hurt people by allowing diseases to spread. Examples include measles, COVID, flu, and polio. A top antivaxxer is HHS Secretary RFK Jr. He is part of the "Disinformation Dozen." He helped cause a deadly 2019 measles outbreak in Samoa.
A 2010 paper that linked hepatitis B vaccines in infant boys to an increased risk of autism diagnosis was retracted and another study by the same authors is under investigation.
The study, published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, claimed that boys vaccinated as neonates had a three times higher odds of an autism diagnosis compared with boys vaccinated after their first month of life or not at all.
The paper was included in a safety review of hepatitis B birth vaccination alongside work from David Geier and presented to the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at their meeting on December 4, the day before the committee voted to drop the agency's long-standing recommendation that every newborn receive a hepatitis B vaccine at birth.
...
The neonate paper was retracted because "concerns were raised regarding the methodology of the study and the reported conclusions," according to a notice from the journal's editor and publisher.
The journal contacted Gallagher and Goodman for an explanation and engaged an independent reviewer for a post-publication statistical review. The reviewer concluded that the study's conclusions were unsound "due to fundamental methodological flaws," leading the journal to retract the article. Gallagher and Goodman did not agree with the retraction.
The study had multiple flaws, noted David Mandell, ScD, of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine in Philadelphia, who was not involved in either the research or the journal's retraction decision.
These shortcomings led to "spurious findings based on a tiny group of children," said Mandell, a member of the Coalition of Autism Scientists, a group of autism researchers. "They speak to the need to radically reform the peer review process so that all science is reviewed with a keener eye."